Hope Estheim (
dreamsoftomorrow) wrote in
melodiesofkupo2018-08-08 02:36 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Text - 01
What makes an Empire evil or bad?
The definition is simply that it's ruled by one person, but nowhere does it state that it's also inherently bad.
So, what makes it bad?
Why are we assuming Sen Devadatta is evil when from what I've read in the history books and from the locals, all they did was shut their doors. We don't know the reason yet either.
It's understandable to be wary and suspicious, but I don't think it's a good idea to go in believing we're going to be arrested or worse.
The definition is simply that it's ruled by one person, but nowhere does it state that it's also inherently bad.
So, what makes it bad?
Why are we assuming Sen Devadatta is evil when from what I've read in the history books and from the locals, all they did was shut their doors. We don't know the reason yet either.
It's understandable to be wary and suspicious, but I don't think it's a good idea to go in believing we're going to be arrested or worse.
no subject
However, we have little to assume the Empire in this world is of martial oppression, and thus, naught. In fact, them shutting doors to the outside world more resembles Ishgard of my realm, rather than the Empire of Garlemald.
no subject
What about Ishgard though? Was it an empire too?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
BUT I JUST CAN'T FATHOM WHY THIS EMPIRE WOULD BE THE SAME. FROM WHAT I SAW OVER THE MOGNET, THEY WERE THREATENED.
PERSONALLY, I THINK THE LEAST WE CAN DO IS SHOW KINDNESS UNTIL WE'RE GIVEN A PROPER REASON TO FRET.
no subject
I'd rarher just keep my eyes and ears open and hope for the best, rather than go in looking for a fight or something. I don't think we have enough information, but it's not a bad thing to be wary.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text;
From what we know, the ruler changed the form of government out of fear. She also grabbed for more power. Generally, when someone in power reacts to something frightening by grabbing for more power, that is not a good sign. Reaching for more is... highly likely.
[ Not certain. But highly likely. ]
For another thing, there are various shapes of monarchy, or even practical monarchy. They did not turn themselves into a kingdom, for example. They became an empire, which is a claim to a certain set of expectations, both when it comes to internal politics and international relationships. The fact that they isolated themselves adds to that image, actually - 'shutting their doors' would be one thing if it was done for a short duration, but a decade does not bode well. It suggest there is much that they are hiding.
And another factor yet is that some people have negative experiences with empires. People draw conclusions for reasons that are not always logical.
All of these are reasons to be cautious, not in any way proof that Sen Devadatta is evil, or even likely evil. Just a reminder that fear takes many shapes, and none of them are kind to the bystanders.
no subject
It doesn't seem very fair to go in assuming the worst when all they've done is invite us to a festival and are now called an empire. But I also don't understand all the differences yet or why anyone would change their form of government, I'm still learning, but I wanted some more perspective than what was taught in school.
(no subject)
Text
I'm sure some of the alarm we're seeing started simply because empires make for convenient bad guys, but at the same time? When a president suddenly declares she wants to start an empire, you have to wonder how exactly she's planning on achieving that.
no subject
But I still wanted others' perspectives on this, because it seemed alarming how quick everyone seemed to jump to one end of the spectrum when we simply don't know enough. Maybe I am being too optimistic about them or naive, and I'll certainly stand corrected if that is the case, but it just doesn't seem very fair either.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text
Regardless, we mustn't judge Sen Devadatta for being a closed country. Much like Sen Devadatta, my country is an island separated from most other territories and we have had periods of isolation in the past, and we are currently under policy of strictly controlled borders. This has mostly been to protect ourselves, as humans where I am from are notoriously greedy and have, more than once, tried to conquer us. I do plan on opening borders when [ if ] I take the throne, but it will be a slow and careful process.
While I agree we should be cautious, we should graciously accept their invitation and deal with them diplomatically. We are outsiders and I think it unfair that some of us are deciding to approach them with the attitude we have. I would be terribly offended if diplomatic envoys I invited personally into my territory readily assumed I did so to harm them, not restore relations!
[ It's the moogle typing. Best text to speech function. ]
no subject
I want to see for myself what this place is about before coming to my own conclusion as well, but learning more from others is never bad either.
I didn't know you were in line to become a ruler of your nation though, Ena. That's really cool. Can I ask more about your world? I know a bit about isolationism myself, although I suppose I didn't realize it at the time until recently.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
i feel it's understandable to be wary of something sharing a name with an entity that spends its time conquering other countries.
no subject
Even if it shares a name, history tells us they have not conquered other nations. Not yet, anyway. All they've done is shut their doors and isolated themselves, right after constant attacks it looks like. It... feels like a different situation, I guess, despite the name they share.
It just doesn't add up, so I don't want to jump the gun just yet.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text;
Honestly most governments suck somehow or another. The big question becomes how much crappy adults willing to steamroll over people for power are able to get it.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
text;
(no subject)
text
no subject
text
Text
Unless it's some city-state that decided to call itself an Empire because it sounded more impressive, but that's not the case here.
no subject
Basically, we're being asked to be guests and we don't really have a reason to be rude to the host. I'm sure even the Empress is aware that we're not going in without our own reservations given they've cut everyone off for ten years.
(no subject)
voice;
Empires are defined by conquest. Taking over other states and nations. That's what an Empire does. They expand, and almost always by force.
no subject
I know, others have told me by now but you shouldn't assume I'm just purposefully oversimplifying things. I asked because I wanted to know. Because I don't know anything about empires aside from what is being taught in the school here.
I ask because I want to learn. And then, when I go, I want to see with my own eyes and listen with my own ears and reach my own conclusions. I don't want to go in blind, but I don't want to assume the worst either. They invited us, we're the guests and going in ready to be rude to the host is only asking for the trouble you're wanting to avoid.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Voice
Voice
Voice
Voice
Voice
Voice
voice;
(no subject)
(no subject)
voice;
Re: voice;
text
But it's more complicated than that. "History is written by the victors." There could be more information that wasn't released. Empires grow. It's their definition. Anyone could argue it's a good or a bad thing, but there will always be people who don't want to be governed that way.
But that's not really my concern. What stands out to me is that Sen Devadatta started as a democracy, then changed -- and then became isolationist. Those are some big changes and I want to know what happened.
Believing the worst might be a bit much, but I think it's naive to accept everything at face value.
no subject
[You can probably read the huff.]
It isn't what I meant when I asked. My world was a theocracy, it's all I knew. It's all I currently know, aside from what I'm learning from Vaikuntha. I was genuine when I asked because it doesn't sound like the type of government doesn't make a nation good or bad, but the people and who the ruler (or rulers) is.
I want to know what caused the change too, I just... I don't want to assume the worst either. They're going out of their way to invite us to a festival and dinner, we should at least see what they have to say, you know?
[private text]
[private text]
no subject
[Sometimes, that's incredibly literal.]
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Good and evil are the notions of a naive child. There is as much 'evil' lurking in the lands that the Empire conquers as there is within the Empire itself.
no subject
But I also don't have any experience with empires, there were none on my world. But I'm asking because while we know virtually nothing about this empire, everyone is assuming its bad. So I wanted to know why.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
While that doesn't mean Sen Devadatta is evil, the truth is we don't know either way.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)